EN

韩梦涛

副研究员(自然科学)    博士生导师    硕士生导师

个人信息 更多+
  • 性别: 男
  • 在职信息: 在职
  • 所在单位: 建筑与城市规划学院
  • 学历: 研究生(博士)毕业
  • 学位: 工学博士学位

其他联系方式

邮编:

通讯/办公地址:

邮箱:

论文成果

当前位置: 韩梦涛 - 科学研究 - 论文成果

H. Chen, X. Wu, M. Han*, and Y. Zhang, “Impacts of solid wall boundary conditions in the lattice Boltzmann method on turbulent outdoor flow: A case study of a single 1:1:2 building model,” Building Environment (SCI检索)

发布时间:2022-11-07
点击次数:
论文类型:
期刊论文
论文编号:
109708
发表刊物:
Building Environment
收录刊物:
SCI
学科门类:
工学
一级学科:
建筑学
文献类型:
J
卷号:
226
期号:
1037
关键字:
Boundary conditions; Bouzidi–Firdaouss–Lallemand (BFL) scheme; Half-way bounce-back scheme; Large-eddy simulation (LES); Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM); lattice boltzmann method; lbm
DOI码:
10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109708
发表时间:
2022-10-26
摘要:
Solid wall boundary condition is an important topic in outdoor wind environment simulation represented by single building based on lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), but there is a lack of quantitative comparative analysis of simulation results under these boundary conditions. This paper conducted LBM-based large-eddy simulation (LBM-LES) of turbulent flow around a 1:1:2 single building, applying both half-way bounce-back and interpolation-based bounce-back (the Bouzidi–Firdaouss–Lallemand scheme, BFL) to solid wall boundaries. The simulation accuracy of different solid wall boundary conditions was examed with consideration of grid resolutions and relative positions between grid points and solid boundaries. Data obtained via experiments and the finite volume method-based large-eddy simulation (FVM-LES) technique were used to examine the flow structure and distribution of the time-averaged velocity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). The computational costs were also discussed. Results demonstrated that when the all the boundaries fell on the grid and orthogonal to the grid, the half-way bounce-back scheme attained a high accuracy. On the contrary, the BFL scheme achieved a higher accuracy if the solid wall boundaries did not fall on the grid. Under both boundary schemes, the grid resolutions of b/32 and b/16 (b: building width) could satisfy the acceptable range, but the b/32 grid resolution facilitated a better performance near the wall. The BFL scheme was more sensitive to the grid resolution and the accuracy improved faster with increasing grid resolution than half-way. As for the calculation costs, the calculation time of BFL is more than twice that of half-way bounce-back. However, BFL is still recommended if the wall boundaries are curved and complex in the actual built environment.
发布期刊链接:
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360132322009386